Motion sensitivity is easy to set but seems hard to get fine tuned. That is stupid as you don't always have a monitor that shows the full camera resolution (for 4K cameras especially). Negatives - No digital zoom on the web, but you can on mobile. Mobile app is easy and intuitive and fast. Positives - setup and config super easy, the live view configuration is awesome and works in all browsers (yay!), notifications and motion are easy to setup. But even that was easy as the Protect software can support a single security model (only 1 password needed for the cameras themselves). The only thing really missing was that I had to login to the cameras directly to enable an anonymous snapshot. camera setup and configuration is super easy, including motion zones, RTSP feed, etc. VERY impressed with this part of the process. Was up and running in like 5 minutes after install, which itself took maybe 5-10 minutes per camera (which includes the taking down of old camera.). Hands down the easiest setup ever for an NVR and cameras. Incidentally, I turned off the controller as I have one running on my network already and wanted this dedicated to security.Ĭamera-wise, I bought a G4 Pro (4k), a G3 Micro, and have a G3 Pro coming Monday. Could have gone the build-your-own route, but the CloudKey G2 is low powered, compact and, well, just works. which is overpriced but well built and looks nice. this has the controller and NVR software embedded and has a rack mount accessory. Third, the mobile app looks easy enough to use and the wife would be happy with it. Image sensors look good, I had no doubt on the camera and build quality. and of course watched many YouTube reviews and comparisons. Second, example pictures from people here were really good. I figured if they put the same emphasis on the Video/Protect then it would be a good thing. But I thank him for it rather than fault him (still want my money, though!) Networking equipment has been solid and the controller software really is some of the best/easiest to setup for the complexity allowed. actually owes me over a thousand dollars because he "made" me go down that route. I decided on Unifi Protect for a few reasons - first off, I love their networking equipment. The only good thing is that it recorded forever (2 HDs in there, but had room for 4). Then you have to use their thick client on OS X which is even worse still. The NVR was the standard Chinese based software that all of them have - it is awful and the mobile app is maybe worse. The IP cameras were all standard 1080p HikVision or similar cameras, all POE. At one point there were 16 active I believe, but several analog cameras had degraded to the point that I just shut them down as they were lagniappe anyway. The new system was to replace an aging DVR/NVR system that served a handful of legacy analog cameras and a handful of IP cameras. Lastly, the WAF is huge because the security cameras are basically her favorite thing in HA and they haven't been working well. Second, it just needs to freaking work well - I am sick and tired of chasing down issues in cheap Third, I want it seamless and easy to use as my previous (and still somewhat in use) system is the furthest thing from it. Here were my important points - first, no cloud reliance for recording (okay if it enhances the service, but must work without). So I made my decision based on a few factors, knowing that nothing was perfect and, in fact, nothing "best" for everyone and everyone's situation. I know several of you were also debating and curious, so I wanted to let you guys know my thoughts and review. After enough internal debate and over thinking and rethinking, I finally just bit the bullet and went with the Ubiquiti solution. As some of you know, I've had a few posts/discussions with various folks over various security camera options over the last few months - Blue Iris, Ubiquiti, standalone NVR, Arlo, Nest, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |